# Is there any reason why small images don't have thumbnails?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-any-reason-why-small-images-dont-have-thumbnails/61806>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [28 Aprile 2017, 11:22pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-any-reason-why-small-images-dont-have-thumbnails/61806 "2017-04-28T23:22:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [29 Aprile 2017, 8:19am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-any-reason-why-small-images-dont-have-thumbnails/61806/7 "2017-04-29T08:19:29Z")

</div>

If I want to do this ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/7/7/778b8145c68ac1e6b5a9e34089ce0121b293aadf.png), you’re gonna take that from me?

Rude 😉

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-any-reason-why-small-images-dont-have-thumbnails/61806)._