# 자동화 스크립트 옵션에서 "사용 가능한 경우 PM 암호화" 체크박스가 여전히 필요한가요?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-still-a-use-case-for-the-encrypts-pm-if-available-checkbox-in-automation-script-options/392664
**Category:** UX
**Tags:** encrypt, automation
**Created:** [1월 4, 2026, 11:46오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-still-a-use-case-for-the-encrypts-pm-if-available-checkbox-in-automation-script-options/392664 "2026-01-04T23:46:34Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Moin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/moin/32/554653_2.png) [@Moin](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Moin)
#### Post date: [1월 4, 2026, 11:46오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-still-a-use-case-for-the-encrypts-pm-if-available-checkbox-in-automation-script-options/392664/1 "2026-01-04T23:46:34Z")

</div>

자동화 스크립트 옵션 하단의 체크박스를 볼 때마다, 거의 1년 전에 아카이브된 #encrypt의 잔재인지, 아니면 이 체크박스에 여전히 사용 사례가 있는지 궁금해집니다.

 ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/2/d/9/2d9e5e883ba77f8c47fb5712272cb5f5b6f0e96e.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![awesomerobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/awesomerobot/32/142900_2.png) [@awesomerobot](https://meta.discourse.org/u/awesomerobot)
#### Post date: [1월 5, 2026, 9:53오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-still-a-use-case-for-the-encrypts-pm-if-available-checkbox-in-automation-script-options/392664/2 "2026-01-05T21:53:28Z")

</div>

남아 있는 것으로 보입니다. 백엔드에도 몇 가지 참조가 있는 것 같네요… 다행히도 그 상태로 두는 데는 당장 문제가 없으며, 항상 PM 전송으로 폴백됩니다. 그래도 정리하는 것이 좋겠습니다.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![zogstrip](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/zogstrip/32/512781_2.png) [@zogstrip](https://meta.discourse.org/u/zogstrip)
#### Post date: [1월 6, 2026, 10:32오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-still-a-use-case-for-the-encrypts-pm-if-available-checkbox-in-automation-script-options/392664/3 "2026-01-06T10:32:42Z")

</div>

잘 짚어주셨네요 @Moin 👍

> <https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/36973>
>
> The "Encrypts PM if available" checkbox in automation script options was a lefto…ver from the discourse-encrypt plugin, which was archived almost a year ago. Since \`EncryptedPostCreator\` no longer exists, the option had no effect - the code always fell back to using the regular \`PostCreator\`.
> 
> This removes all traces of the \`prefers\_encrypt\` feature:
> \- The checkbox UI in the PM field component
> \- The \`prefers\_encrypt\` parameter from \`Utils.send\_pm\`
> \- References in send\_pms and gift\_exchange scripts
> \- The column from the pending\_pms table (via post-deploy migration)
> \- Associated translations and tests
> 
> The column removal follows the standard two-phase approach: first declaring \`ignored\_columns\` in the model, then dropping the column in a post-deploy migration.
> 
> Ref - https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/392664

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![zogstrip](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/zogstrip/32/512781_2.png) [@zogstrip](https://meta.discourse.org/u/zogstrip)
#### Post date: [1월 9, 2026, 7:00오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-still-a-use-case-for-the-encrypts-pm-if-available-checkbox-in-automation-script-options/392664/5 "2026-01-09T07:00:55Z")

</div>

이 주제는 20시간 후 자동으로 닫혔습니다. 더 이상 새 답변을 쓸 수 없습니다.