# בעיות שמתעוררות בשימוש במצב איטי על נושא לצמיתות

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/issues-when-using-slow-mode-on-a-topic-forever/186607
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** slow-mode
**Created:** [10 באפריל,‏ 2021,‏ 6:13am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/issues-when-using-slow-mode-on-a-topic-forever/186607 "2021-04-10T06:13:32Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dfabulich](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/dfabulich/32/108716_2.png) [@dfabulich](https://meta.discourse.org/u/dfabulich)
#### Post date: [10 באפריל,‏ 2021,‏ 4:43pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/issues-when-using-slow-mode-on-a-topic-forever/186607/3 "2021-04-10T16:43:15Z")

</div>

Slow mode affects editing. During the cool down period, you’re not allowed to edit your post, and editing your post itself resets the timer. This makes perfect sense to me. As you wrote,

> [@Post Rate Limit Trigger for a topic that's heating up](https://meta.discourse.org/t/post-rate-limit-trigger-for-a-topic-thats-heating-up/98294/79):
>
> No, because users will decide that if they cannot post, but only edit, they should therefore _always_ edit… they will proceed to go back and edit in a bunch of back of forth into their existing posts. I am absolutely 110% sure they would do this.

The problem is that people then think “slow mode means you can’t edit any posts ever.” [EDIT: you can’t any posts in slow mode, I mean]

Does that make sense?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/issues-when-using-slow-mode-on-a-topic-forever/186607)._
