# Just-in-time behavior nudging

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/just-in-time-behavior-nudging/4829>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** completed\
**Created:** [Mars 16, 2013, 11:23 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/just-in-time-behavior-nudging/4829 "2013-03-16T23:23:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aja](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/aja/32/103616_2.png) [@aja](https://meta.discourse.org/u/aja)\
**Post date:** [Mars 16, 2013, 11:23 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/just-in-time-behavior-nudging/4829/1 "2013-03-16T23:23:24Z")

</div>

So obviously this would be for communities with very high standards for behavior/etc.

What would you all think about the usefulness of running some sort of basic semantic analysis (or even just word matching) on new posts, and popping up a little “nudge” when the post is questionable? Like so: (sorry, my attempts to be insulting are really lame)

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/1X/54200ea60cb2d9af197420d015d4273e53fd31e1.jpg)

Would a gentle nudge in the right direction be useful?

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/1X/43115baf0cf06a582713f3a0bb88dab20c83defb.jpg)

Another option would be to automatically catch txtspeak, all-caps, no-caps, etc, and offer the user an auto-correction before posting. Something like: “Hello Aja!&nbsp; We’ve automatically edited a bit of the spelling and/or grammar in your contribution.&nbsp; Please take a look over these changes, and feel free to make any additional corrections before submitting your post.&nbsp; Thanks!”

Thoughts?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/just-in-time-behavior-nudging/4829)._