# Свободно чуть меньше 200 МБ оперативной памяти?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/just-under-200-mb-free-ram/291812>\
**Category:** Self-hosting\
**Created:** [16.Январь.2024 16:48:20 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/just-under-200-mb-free-ram/291812 "2024-01-16T16:48:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ed\_S](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/ed_s/32/134015_2.png) [@Ed\_S](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Ed_S)\
**Post date:** [16.Январь.2024 22:17:54 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/just-under-200-mb-free-ram/291812/4 "2024-01-16T22:17:54Z")

</div>

> [@Jakke Flemming](#):
>
> И я бы предположил, что в `swapon` нет необходимости (если бы я подключил swap-раздел…)

Я считаю, что swap всё ещё полезен. Например, посмотрите

> **[Linux Performance: Almost Always Add Swap Space](https://linuxblog.io/linux-performance-almost-always-add-swap-space/)**
>
> Swap vs no swap. With enough RAM available, is it better to remove swap space? Find out the performance benefits of swap space.

и

> **[In defence of swap: common misconceptions](https://chrisdown.name/2018/01/02/in-defence-of-swap.html)**
>
> tl;dr: Having swap is a reasonably important part of a well functioning system. Without it, sane memory management becomes harder to achieve.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/just-under-200-mb-free-ram/291812)._