# Learning Management Systems

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/learning-management-systems/79855>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [February 5, 2018, 7:44pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/learning-management-systems/79855 "2018-02-05T19:44:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MAR](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mar/32/71419_2.png) [@MAR](https://meta.discourse.org/u/MAR)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2018, 8:54pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/learning-management-systems/79855/3 "2018-02-05T20:54:31Z")

</div>

This sounds pretty great. We typically have this approach for the non-confidential discussions but with the industry our client is responsible for training, we want to make learning progress highly trackable for each individual member/group (along with metrics) while maintaining a forum as well. Hence the idea of LMS combined with Discourse. The client will procure experts based on the many topics.

I will brainstorm on how to use your approach in some other community plans we have. This is very well thought out and I see the value for driving engagement. Thanks @pfaffman!

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/learning-management-systems/79855)._