# LeaseWeb experiences

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/leaseweb-experiences/56910>\
**Category:** Self-hosting\
**Tags:** hosting\
**Created:** [4. Februar 2017 um 17:00 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/leaseweb-experiences/56910 "2017-02-04T17:00:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ljpp](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/ljpp/32/96506_2.png) [@ljpp](https://meta.discourse.org/u/ljpp)\
**Post date:** [7. Februar 2017 um 19:11 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/leaseweb-experiences/56910/15 "2017-02-07T19:11:41Z")

</div>

Yeah. We’ll see how it goes. The reason for poor I/O benchmark is that they are using SAS drives for storage. They advertise an SSD caching layer that should help when most needed - but this can be just sales talk.

We’ll see how it goes. LeaseWeb seems like a solid company. They have been around for 20 years, their network has a good rep and they offer a full range of products. I’ll give it a good and long test run and report back.

Edit: One thing worth noting - LeaseWeb has **24/7** global tech support. Many service providers in this price category only provide support during office hours, or maybe extended office hours.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/leaseweb-experiences/56910)._