# Magic Group Functionality

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/magic-group-functionality/78086>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [January 15, 2018, 6:29pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/magic-group-functionality/78086 "2018-01-15T18:29:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![techAPJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/techapj/32/342990_2.png) [@techAPJ](https://meta.discourse.org/u/techAPJ)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2018, 5:25am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/magic-group-functionality/78086/10 "2018-10-04T05:25:31Z")

</div>

Currently bulk invite process is not granting access to groups to user who already exists. However if you are bulk inviting users to a private topic (PM or topic that requires group access) then we do grant user access to that topic.

> [@outofthebox](#):
>
> The easiest outcome, by far, is that those who do not have accounts receive an invite and that those who do have accounts get added to the groups included in the bulk invite CVS.

> [@outofthebox](#):
>
> What would be cool is if those lines then run through another process to add those accounts to all the respective groups on the bulk invite .csv.

I agree. Added on my list. 📝

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/magic-group-functionality/78086)._
