# Making launcher a bit more versatile

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/making-launcher-a-bit-more-versatile/56851>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [February 3, 2017, 9:15am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/making-launcher-a-bit-more-versatile/56851 "2017-02-03T09:15:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JagWaugh](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jagwaugh/32/69335_2.png) [@JagWaugh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JagWaugh)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2017, 12:19pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/making-launcher-a-bit-more-versatile/56851/4 "2017-02-22T12:19:14Z")

</div>

And another thing…

I’m just walking through removing the plugins one after the other to try and isolate [this problem](https://meta.discourse.org/t/strange-problem-with-data-explorer/57751).

It just occurred to me, there is no way to do ./launcher rebuild app without pulling the latest image from docker, right?

I’m trying to narrow in on a local problem, making local changes, but I am also pulling remote changes at the same time.

Any way to do something like ./launcher rebuild app --local\_only ?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/making-launcher-a-bit-more-versatile/56851)._