# Making the activation process a one step process rather than two

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/making-the-activation-process-a-one-step-process-rather-than-two/34984>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [27 Ottobre 2015, 9:53pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/making-the-activation-process-a-one-step-process-rather-than-two/34984 "2015-10-27T21:53:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mischief](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mischief/32/4291_2.png) [@Mischief](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Mischief)\
**Post date:** [28 Ottobre 2015, 12:33pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/making-the-activation-process-a-one-step-process-rather-than-two/34984/8 "2015-10-28T12:33:25Z")

</div>

> [@Mittineague](#):
>
> And your version of Discourse is up-to-date?

yes totally up-to-date.

> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> @Mischief not sure what to tell you, spam prevention requires a browser action with timer to make sure it’s a real human being activating that account. Sorry.

No problem - I can fully understand the need for the spam prevention techniques. We might though need to look at ways to increase the click through rate - maybe changes to either the email wording, or to the wording on the page to make it clearer that people need to take both actions.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/making-the-activation-process-a-one-step-process-rather-than-two/34984)._