# Manually blocked users should not be allowed TL3

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/manually-blocked-users-should-not-be-allowed-tl3/47797>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** trust-levels\
**Created:** [26 Julio, 2016 04:34 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/manually-blocked-users-should-not-be-allowed-tl3/47797 "2016-07-26T04:34:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jomaxro](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jomaxro/32/126216_2.png) [@jomaxro](https://meta.discourse.org/u/jomaxro)\
**Post date:** [26 Julio, 2016 04:58 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/manually-blocked-users-should-not-be-allowed-tl3/47797/3 "2016-07-26T04:58:59Z")

</div>

> [@Mittineague](#):
>
> What are you proposing that is different?

Unless I am missing something, suspending a user (or blocking them) does **not** automatically block their trust level. Further, if a user was suspended (or blocked), within the last 100 days, they are/should be prevented from reaching TL3, without staff needing to manually lock their trust level.

Is this not what currently happens for suspensions?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/manually-blocked-users-should-not-be-allowed-tl3/47797)._