# Markdown Quote with Onebox Header

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/markdown-quote-with-onebox-header/22258>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [18 Novembre 2014, 8:09am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/markdown-quote-with-onebox-header/22258 "2014-11-18T08:09:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Buddy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/buddy/32/41024_2.png) [@Buddy](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Buddy)\
**Post date:** [18 Novembre 2014, 10:47pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/markdown-quote-with-onebox-header/22258/3 "2014-11-18T22:47:36Z")

</div>

I would expect that, if I am understanding what you mean by compatibility correctly, that the change to standard markdown would be a breaking change, and that a solution could be to add a ‘parser version’ column to posts to identify the posts that should never be rebaked – problems with those posts can be solved by editing, to trigger a fresh bake with the new parser.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/markdown-quote-with-onebox-header/22258)._