# Les membres d'un groupe nommant et révoquant les membres d'un autre groupe

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/members-of-one-group-appointing-and-removing-members-of-another-group/204678
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** groups
**Created:** [Septembre 28, 2021, 7:49 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/members-of-one-group-appointing-and-removing-members-of-another-group/204678 "2021-09-28T19:49:50Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tris20](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/tris20/32/264639_2.png) [@Tris20](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Tris20)
#### Post date: [Février 16, 2022, 4:20 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/members-of-one-group-appointing-and-removing-members-of-another-group/204678/5 "2022-02-16T16:20:00Z")

</div>

Ce serait extrêmement utile et compléterait bien la fonctionnalité de modérateur de catégorie. Dans notre cas d’utilisation, nous avons deux groupes par catégorie : Modérateurs, Membres. Dans un monde idéal, les Modérateurs sont aussi les propriétaires des Membres. Cela signifie que lorsqu’un administrateur ajoute quelqu’un au groupe Modérateurs, il est ajouté au groupe Membres en tant que propriétaire.

Je ne suis pas sûr que ce soit le fil de discussion que vous vouliez dire @sam ? C’était le seul que j’ai pu trouver avec une valeur raisonnable pour ce sujet.

> [@Group owners should not necessarily be group members](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-owners-should-not-necessarily-be-group-members/38394):
>
> On my site I have a use case for people being given the privilege of managing group membership without being a member of the group themselves. I assumed this is how it worked and was surprised to see that someone I added as group manager is now also a group member. The use case? We use groups to assign badges. And to give access to private categories. And the people responsible for doing this are not always group members. Edit: having noticed this, I then removed some group owners only to real…

> [@Group owners should not necessarily be group members](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-owners-should-not-necessarily-be-group-members/38394/5):
>
> Sure, I am open to disconnecting the two permissions.

> [@Group owners should not necessarily be group members](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-owners-should-not-necessarily-be-group-members/38394/6):
>
> Any chance the goal of “group owner does not need to be group member” with stretch goal of “group can be named as owner of another group” would be suitable for a GSoC project?

> [@Group owners should not necessarily be group members](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-owners-should-not-necessarily-be-group-members/38394/7):
>
> Very unlikely, way too small of a job. Group can be owner of another group is not even something I would be comfortable adding.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/members-of-one-group-appointing-and-removing-members-of-another-group/204678)._