# Milestones / Status as subcategories added for features and bugs categories

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/milestones-status-as-subcategories-added-for-features-and-bugs-categories/23328>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [22 Dezembro , 2014 04:46 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/milestones-status-as-subcategories-added-for-features-and-bugs-categories/23328 "2014-12-22T04:46:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gingerman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/47e85d/32.png) [@gingerman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/gingerman)\
**Post date:** [22 Dezembro , 2014 16:55 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/milestones-status-as-subcategories-added-for-features-and-bugs-categories/23328/4 "2014-12-22T16:55:54Z")

</div>

@sam that sounds right. Thanks

@codinghorror Thanks for letting me know about the rules followed here. What I stated is one of many best practises in opensource communities… obviously you can ignore it.

Anyway, I will add the suggestions below based on your remarks..

Feature topics which are already in the roadmap can atleast be marked with ‘versions’. Other topics can be added as ‘later’. This is to avoid the back and forth between a newbie and a community members (finally pointing out the roadmap topics).

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/milestones-status-as-subcategories-added-for-features-and-bugs-categories/23328)._