# \`min ratio to crop\` 站点设置应尊重 Markdown 中定义的宽高比

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/min-ratio-to-crop-site-setting-should-respect-w-h-ratio-as-defined-in-markdown/138374>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [2020年一月12日 09:13 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/min-ratio-to-crop-site-setting-should-respect-w-h-ratio-as-defined-in-markdown/138374 "2020-01-12T09:13:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Remah](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/remah/32/70590_2.png) [@Remah](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Remah)\
**Post date:** [2020年一月12日 11:52 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/min-ratio-to-crop-site-setting-should-respect-w-h-ratio-as-defined-in-markdown/138374/4 "2020-01-12T11:52:45Z")

</div>

我明白你的意思了：我刚才说的是，据我理解，这是标准行为。

换句话说，你并没有手动裁剪保存帖子的尺寸。我认为你无法这样做，但团队成员可以确认这一点。

请查看以下帖子，其中解释了如何处理调整大小。你会发现，除非高度和宽度的数值是实际尺寸，否则同时设置这两个测量值将不起作用：

> [@Can we get rid of height/width auto in oneboxes?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/can-we-get-rid-of-height-width-auto-in-oneboxes/72579/17?u=remah):
>
> This is now fixed per: The non-jittery-ness will be present on all new posts or rebaked posts as we needed to make some internal html changes. (note that the post processor that downloads images must run first which may take a minute or 2) The non-jittery-ness works fine in all modern browsers (edge,firefox,chrome) but old behavior remains in IE. It is implemented using serious levels of voodoo and CSS vars described here:

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/min-ratio-to-crop-site-setting-should-respect-w-h-ratio-as-defined-in-markdown/138374)._