# Kleine RFE: vertraging in plaats van volledige blokkering voor het overschrijden van de limiet voor opeenvolgende berichten

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/minor-rfe-delay-instead-of-complete-block-for-exceeding-consecutive-post-limit/218474
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [16 februari 2022 om 22:08 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/minor-rfe-delay-instead-of-complete-block-for-exceeding-consecutive-post-limit/218474 "2022-02-16T22:08:16Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mattdm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mattdm/32/216484_2.png) [@mattdm](https://meta.discourse.org/u/mattdm)
#### Post date: [16 februari 2022 om 22:08 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/minor-rfe-delay-instead-of-complete-block-for-exceeding-consecutive-post-limit/218474/1 "2022-02-16T22:08:16Z")

</div>

We have some topics were one person might be working on a design or other problem, and posting updates as they go — even without others responding. I can increase (and actually, have increased!) `max consecutive replies` to allow this, but that _does_ seem like a useful defense against potential abuse.

Could this be made to be a required delay between posts, instead? Perhaps, start with 10 seconds between posts, and double every time?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pfaffman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/pfaffman/32/120154_2.png) [@pfaffman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pfaffman)
#### Post date: [16 februari 2022 om 23:59 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/minor-rfe-delay-instead-of-complete-block-for-exceeding-consecutive-post-limit/218474/2 "2022-02-16T23:59:08Z")

</div>

Sorry for treating feature as support, but cold you just let them edit the OP? Maybe make it a wiki if it were gong to go on for longer than the edit time for a topic?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mattdm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mattdm/32/216484_2.png) [@mattdm](https://meta.discourse.org/u/mattdm)
#### Post date: [17 februari 2022 om 16:14 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/minor-rfe-delay-instead-of-complete-block-for-exceeding-consecutive-post-limit/218474/3 "2022-02-17T16:14:42Z")

</div>

They could, but:

1. I think separate posts actually make sense for a lot of these where it’s a sequence of updates where it’s actually interesting to see the history of what happened (like, designs being refined as they’re worked on).
2. Many of our folks are primarily following by email. And emails aren’t sent for edits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MentalNomad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mentalnomad/32/95159_2.png) [@MentalNomad](https://meta.discourse.org/u/MentalNomad)
#### Post date: [12 maart 2023 om 16:59 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/minor-rfe-delay-instead-of-complete-block-for-exceeding-consecutive-post-limit/218474/4 "2023-03-12T16:59:31Z")

</div>

This seems to be a recurring problem at multiple Discourse sites.

Anyone with a Blog topic gets stopped from time to time, until a follower comments to free them to proceed.

“Has there been any progress on the garden project?”  
“Yes, but I couldn’t post until you asked!”

Perhaps a better solution, instead of a limit of 3 consecutive posts, make it a limit of 3 consecutive posts in a given day? Or 3 consecutive posts for a week?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JammyDodger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jammydodger/32/254611_2.png) [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### Post date: [12 maart 2023 om 19:07 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/minor-rfe-delay-instead-of-complete-block-for-exceeding-consecutive-post-limit/218474/5 "2023-03-12T19:07:37Z")

</div>

Just as a FWIW, the ‘3 consecutive replies’ limit doesn’t apply to the person who posted the topic, so someone should be able to create a ‘project topic’ and happily add as many consecutive posts as they like. 👍
