# Missing text \`dashboard.problem.sidekiq\_check\`

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-text-dashboard-problem-sidekiq-check/395969
**Category:** UX
**Created:** [February 12, 2026, 11:00pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-text-dashboard-problem-sidekiq-check/395969 "2026-02-12T23:00:12Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pmusaraj](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/pmusaraj/32/119489_2.png) [@pmusaraj](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pmusaraj)
#### Post date: [July 24, 2026, 4:34pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-text-dashboard-problem-sidekiq-check/395969/6 "2026-07-24T16:34:40Z")

</div>

> [@Moin](#):
>
> Kind of a two-in-one solution supporting both the override case and the identifier case?

Yes, correct.

> [@Moin](#):
>
> So why is an override needed here?

It isn’t needed, this likely would work fine if we did `return problem` in line 8 of sidekiq\_check.rb. They’re equivalent. (I kept the override reference to have a smaller change in that PR at the time.)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-text-dashboard-problem-sidekiq-check/395969)._
