# Missing total numbers in admin stats view

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-total-numbers-in-admin-stats-view/136283
**Category:** UX
**Created:** [December 17, 2019, 5:12am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-total-numbers-in-admin-stats-view/136283 "2019-12-17T05:12:10Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![wolftune](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/wolftune/32/103569_2.png) [@wolftune](https://meta.discourse.org/u/wolftune)
#### Post date: [December 17, 2019, 5:12am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-total-numbers-in-admin-stats-view/136283/1 "2019-12-17T05:12:10Z")

</div>

See this screenshot of a weekly stats:

 ![Screenshot_2019-12-16 Admin - Snowdrift coop Community Discussions](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/f/0/f0c462a53916b7b3d9e05aac46fc143cefdb8e7d.png)

Signups and New Contributors have no numbers for the total where the other items have that. Even if the total is 0, it should be shown.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Johani](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/johani/32/176920_2.png) [@Johani](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Johani)
#### Post date: [December 17, 2019, 7:22am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-total-numbers-in-admin-stats-view/136283/2 "2019-12-17T07:22:40Z")

</div>

This is a bit of an edge case. We consider changes between `-2` and `+2` to be insignificant. If the change for the period is in that range, you’ll still get the chart but not the trend indicator.

> <https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/bd92fdeb4d5e0d366d8a40dded5109d7aa74b282/app/assets/javascripts/admin/models/report.js.es6#L463-L464>

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![wolftune](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/wolftune/32/103569_2.png) [@wolftune](https://meta.discourse.org/u/wolftune)
#### Post date: [December 17, 2019, 4:53pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-total-numbers-in-admin-stats-view/136283/3 "2019-12-17T16:53:52Z")

</div>

What about showing the plain number without the trend indicator?

The bit you quoted could have a situation where the number is higher, like 79 or whatever and yet it’s still not showing any number. Surely someone wouldn’t bother adding up all the numbers in the chart. The plain _sum_ is not itself the trend.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![maiki](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/maiki/32/233950_2.png) [@maiki](https://meta.discourse.org/u/maiki)
#### Post date: [December 17, 2019, 11:17pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-total-numbers-in-admin-stats-view/136283/4 "2019-12-17T23:17:55Z")

</div>

> [@wolftune](#):
>
> What about showing the plain number without the trend indicator?

If you click on the title of each trend chart, it takes you to a report with the _cold, **hard** _ numbers. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![wolftune](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/wolftune/32/103569_2.png) [@wolftune](https://meta.discourse.org/u/wolftune)
#### Post date: [December 17, 2019, 11:31pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/missing-total-numbers-in-admin-stats-view/136283/5 "2019-12-17T23:31:24Z")

</div>

Thanks. It still seems trivial and sensible to still show the sum. Just would need to make the hiding command affect only the up/down trend _part_ of the view. Minor quibble I’ll admit.