# Moderate emails which would normally bounce?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/moderate-emails-which-would-normally-bounce/30331>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [2015 年 6 月 22 日午後 7:11 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/moderate-emails-which-would-normally-bounce/30331 "2015-06-22T19:11:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![watchmanmonitor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/watchmanmonitor/32/430970_2.png) [@watchmanmonitor](https://meta.discourse.org/u/watchmanmonitor)\
**Post date:** [2015 年 6 月 22 日午後 7:11 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/moderate-emails-which-would-normally-bounce/30331/1 "2015-06-22T19:11:53Z")

</div>

Continuing the discussion from [Allow posts in all upper case](https://meta.discourse.org/t/allow-posts-in-all-upper-case/30324/3):

> [@watchmanmonitor](#):
>
> If the post had been held for moderation instead of bounced, that’d have made it all much easier.. now that moderation is a thing, maybe we can get that result, instead of bouncing emails?

Now that moderation is a thing, could we get a checkbox or option (or default behavior) to hold emails from known users for moderation, instead of bouncing them?

In this forum, we don’t want to moderate all posts, but would be more than happy to handle the handful of moderated posts, instead of having the emails bounce back.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/moderate-emails-which-would-normally-bounce/30331)._