# Strumento di moderazione per la formattazione del codice con AI

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/moderation-tool-for-formatting-code-with-ai/347980>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** ai\
**Created:** [20 Gennaio 2025, 8:35am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/moderation-tool-for-formatting-code-with-ai/347980 "2025-01-20T08:35:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
**Post date:** [22 Gennaio 2025, 1:38am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/moderation-tool-for-formatting-code-with-ai/347980/9 "2025-01-22T01:38:49Z")

</div>

Non proprio, l’ho testato ed è costoso e certamente non perfetto:

> **[Using predicted outputs for proofreading](https://community.openai.com/t/using-predicted-outputs-for-proofreading/1098128)**
>
> I decided to give predicted outputs a quick test run for “text proofreading”. It seems like a good fit because the majority of the text is unchanged. However: It increases costs Speed benefit is good but not earth-shattering It has an...

Direi che un approccio basato su “diff” ha probabilmente le maggiori possibilità di funzionare.

Qualcosa del genere potrebbe funzionare (output JSON alla ricerca di marcatori) [Crafting Concise Prompts for Markdown Formatting - AI Conversation - Discourse Meta](https://meta.discourse.org/discourse-ai/ai-bot/shared-ai-conversations/0qF2fpDR-we8Dr2EEmjwdQ)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/moderation-tool-for-formatting-code-with-ai/347980)._