# More consistency in reply-indicator
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/more-consistency-in-reply-indicator/31901
**Category:** UX
**Created:** [2015年八月8日 12:36 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/more-consistency-in-reply-indicator/31901 "2015-08-08T12:36:25Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@erlend\_sh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/erlend_sh)
#### Post date: [2015年八月8日 12:36 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/more-consistency-in-reply-indicator/31901/1 "2015-08-08T12:36:26Z")
Continuing the discussion from [Moving post-specific reply indicator into the editor](https://meta.discourse.org/t/moving-post-specific-reply-indicator-into-the-editor/31899/8):
> [@Moving post-specific reply indicator into the editor](https://meta.discourse.org/t/moving-post-specific-reply-indicator-into-the-editor/31899/8):
>
> (…) I think the major loss would be that every single reply would suddenly have this weird metadata shoved into the body, when the reality is that **95% of replies are to a single person** – or to nobody at all, because they are replying to the topic in general.
>
> You’re proposing a change that would make it _worse_ for the 95% to make the 5% case better. That doesn’t wash.
Okay, you made some good points there, so I’m gonna flip-flop completely and suggest a milder UX change instead, focusing on this:
> [@Moving post-specific reply indicator into the editor](https://meta.discourse.org/t/moving-post-specific-reply-indicator-into-the-editor/31899/7):
>
> I’m gonna be pretty convinced that my reply to that user is somehow the “parent, overarching reply” here, due to its unique UX.
I think when you reply to someone’s post, the Editor Header should just tack on that person’s name, instead of changing the header entirely:
If you quote other people in that same post, those people are tacked on up there.
Furthermore, there’s actually an inconsistency in the UX with regards to replies:
- If I start an empty Reply to OP immediately followed by quoting someone’s post, the Editor header doesn’t change.
- However, if instead of quoting someone _after_ I’ve opened the editor I do it _before_, (i.e. the quote action opens the editor), the header will now tell me that I’m replying directly to that person.
I think this method of “tacking on” the user(s) you’re specifically addressing would more effectively teach new users how Discourse handles replies.
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [2015年八月8日 20:37 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/more-consistency-in-reply-indicator/31901/2 "2015-08-08T20:37:02Z")
Would not fit on mobile, unfortunately. Also buries the lede IMO.
---
### Author:  [@Tom\_Newsom](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Tom_Newsom)
#### Post date: [2015年八月10日 09:47 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/more-consistency-in-reply-indicator/31901/3 "2015-08-10T09:47:37Z")
I like the motivation behind these ideas. How about applying a style to the post you’re replying to? A subtle highlight would let you know that you’re doing something to that post, rather than the thread at large.
