# More efficient (inline) template usage

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/more-efficient-inline-template-usage/278757>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** templates\
**Created:** [September 12, 2023, 4:16pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/more-efficient-inline-template-usage/278757 "2023-09-12T16:16:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BryanV](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/bryanv/32/226479_2.png) [@BryanV](https://meta.discourse.org/u/BryanV)\
**Post date:** [May 10, 2024, 4:56pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/more-efficient-inline-template-usage/278757/10 "2024-05-10T16:56:55Z")

</div>

> [@Qwerty8](#):
>
> I believe the OP _is_ using that plugin. They just don’t like that the plugin auto-inserts a couple of new lines.

That is correct. Adding arbitrary unconditional newlines to a template that is already capable of expressing newlines wherever desired only serves to _strictly reduce_ the available functionality.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/more-efficient-inline-template-usage/278757)._