# Move from standalone container to separate web and data containers

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/move-from-standalone-container-to-separate-web-and-data-containers/29413
**Category:** Sysadmins
**Tags:** docker, how-to, advanced-setup, two-container
**Created:** [May 29, 2015, 2:12pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/move-from-standalone-container-to-separate-web-and-data-containers/29413 "2015-05-29T14:12:22Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![downey](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/downey/32/166878_2.png) [@downey](https://meta.discourse.org/u/downey)
#### Post date: [May 4, 2016, 7:36pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/move-from-standalone-container-to-separate-web-and-data-containers/29413/4 "2016-05-04T19:36:31Z")

</div>

When someone like @sam puts out instructions to rebuild the “app” container for fixes like this one, is it safe to assume it’s generally going to be in the `web_only` container?

> [@ImageMagick CVE-2016–3714](https://meta.discourse.org/t/imagemagick-cve-2016-3714/43624/5):
>
> Fixed per: [https://github.com/discourse/discourse\_docker/commit/d47aa69bb72dea153b6901866bb66afe2cca6915](https://github.com/discourse/discourse_docker/commit/d47aa69bb72dea153b6901866bb66afe2cca6915) I will also rebuild the entire image next week when Image Magick do a new point release. To take advantage of the fix: cd /var/discourse ./launcher rebuild app

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/move-from-standalone-container-to-separate-web-and-data-containers/29413)._