# Multiple backup schedules **URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/multiple-backup-schedules/223312 **Category:** Feature **Created:** [April 5, 2022, 8:36am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multiple-backup-schedules/223312 "2022-04-05T08:36:27Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 13
### Author: ![Decorbuz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/decorbuz/32/235124_2.png) [@Decorbuz](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Decorbuz) #### Post date: [April 13, 2022, 6:23pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multiple-backup-schedules/223312/13 "2022-04-13T18:23:16Z")
> [@RGJ](#): > > I don’t think there is much interest for more frequent backups. If there was, someone would have written a plugin for it. How much do you think it would cost to develop? Depending on the price, I’d be willing to fund it right now if you’re interested. 💵 > [@Jagster](#): > > Well, we are talking here without any comments from the team. Again 🤣 That issue has already been addressed by CDCK. Just give them some time to respond, that’s all. > [@How to make contributing to Meta more enjoyable?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/how-to-make-contributing-to-meta-more-enjoyable/222806/46): > > I’m going to jump in here because I manage the team that supports you both for free here on Meta and paid if you are a customer. I have read every post in this topic. Some of the comments are fair and some are misplaced. We care very much about the open source community, it is the foundation of Discourse, but good business dictates that we prioritise our paying customers. We are aware that as we grow and get busier it is harder to read through every post here on Meta. We have exhaustive discus… --- _[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multiple-backup-schedules/223312)._