# Multisite viability - 2 read-only and 1 active

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-viability-2-read-only-and-1-active/81347
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [2월 23, 2018, 8:07오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-viability-2-read-only-and-1-active/81347 "2018-02-23T20:07:15Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Silvanus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/silvanus/32/62831_2.png) [@Silvanus](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Silvanus)
#### Post date: [2월 23, 2018, 8:07오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-viability-2-read-only-and-1-active/81347/1 "2018-02-23T20:07:15Z")

</div>

I’m wondering how hard would it be to have 3 sites running at the same time. 2 sites would be archives and read-only, and one site would be the one with new discussion.

How hard would this be? Would it be doable with the lowest or second lowest price Digital Ocean droplet?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![fefrei](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/fefrei/32/119538_2.png) [@fefrei](https://meta.discourse.org/u/fefrei)
#### Post date: [2월 24, 2018, 4:49오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-viability-2-read-only-and-1-active/81347/2 "2018-02-24T16:49:29Z")

</div>

Since additional multisite instances require almost no resources at all, I don’t see why this shouldn’t work. I’d recommend you try it – upgrading to a larger instance is pretty painless if it turns out you need it.

Multisite installations are a bit tricky, though, so you should plan some time for careful study of [the instructions](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-configuration-with-docker/14084) and some experimentation 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Silvanus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/silvanus/32/62831_2.png) [@Silvanus](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Silvanus)
#### Post date: [3월 7, 2018, 12:30오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-viability-2-read-only-and-1-active/81347/3 "2018-03-07T12:30:29Z")

</div>

> [@fefrei](#):
>
> additional multisite instances require almost no resources at all

OH?! Is that the case?! Wow. Thanks for letting me know! 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JammyDodger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jammydodger/32/254611_2.png) [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### Post date: [6월 8, 2024, 12:37오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-viability-2-read-only-and-1-active/81347/4 "2024-06-08T12:37:44Z")

</div>

이 주제는 2296일 후 자동으로 닫혔습니다. 더 이상 새로운 답변을 남길 수 없습니다.