# إمكانية التشغيل المتعدد للمواقع - قراءه فقط اثنين وواحد نشط

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-viability-2-read-only-and-1-active/81347
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [23 فبراير 2018، 8:07م UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-viability-2-read-only-and-1-active/81347 "2018-02-23T20:07:15Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![fefrei](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/fefrei/32/119538_2.png) [@fefrei](https://meta.discourse.org/u/fefrei)
#### Post date: [24 فبراير 2018، 4:49م UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-viability-2-read-only-and-1-active/81347/2 "2018-02-24T16:49:29Z")

</div>

Since additional multisite instances require almost no resources at all, I don’t see why this shouldn’t work. I’d recommend you try it – upgrading to a larger instance is pretty painless if it turns out you need it.

Multisite installations are a bit tricky, though, so you should plan some time for careful study of [the instructions](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-configuration-with-docker/14084) and some experimentation 🙂

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/multisite-viability-2-read-only-and-1-active/81347)._