# Naming bookmarks

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/naming-bookmarks/46052
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [June 20, 2016, 6:00am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/naming-bookmarks/46052 "2016-06-20T06:00:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Drew\_Warwick](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/drew_warwick/32/80591_2.png) [@Drew\_Warwick](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Drew_Warwick)
#### Post date: [April 14, 2017, 3:36pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/naming-bookmarks/46052/7 "2017-04-14T15:36:30Z")

</div>

> [@sam](#):
>
> then all your bookmarks will be sorted by category which makes it easier for you to reason about them in groups

Category can’t usually tell me any more than the topic title does. The problem still remains that what I bookmarked may not be directly related to the original post. For instance, take this topic:

![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/7/d/a/7da4b538f11c7a4a6726f4452b85f3a5c32c2983.png)  
“Undo discards script changes” – makes sense that it’s filed as a bug, so that doesn’t really tell me anything. If I open up the topic, I’ll find that I bookmarked a post by a staff member that explained how to enable and read log files for their Studio program. This is something that can’t be determined just by knowing the topic’s title/category.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/naming-bookmarks/46052)._