# Natural breakpoints or "chapters" for long topics?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/natural-breakpoints-or-chapters-for-long-topics/16461
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [12 juni 2014 om 00:08 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/natural-breakpoints-or-chapters-for-long-topics/16461 "2014-06-12T00:08:49Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![elijah](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/elijah/32/104055_2.png) [@elijah](https://meta.discourse.org/u/elijah)
#### Post date: [30 juni 2016 om 23:32 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/natural-breakpoints-or-chapters-for-long-topics/16461/25 "2016-06-30T23:32:26Z")

</div>

Overall, I like the ideas there, but I would lose the bar graph part of this:

[![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/a/d/ad468398b63b79fe2a98879e0b518212aee2c88c.png) ](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/a/d/ad468398b63b79fe2a98879e0b518212aee2c88c.png)

The break in the line is more interesting than seeing the relative activity. The lack of units on either dimension of the bar graph is a big negative.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/natural-breakpoints-or-chapters-for-long-topics/16461)._