If I can get some guidance with code snippet from core that uses the ignored user function to check post/comment that hides post if author of post/comment is ignored. I am looking to create a modification to have it check if a post/comment is a reply to an ignored user and hide the post/comment if made to an ignored user.

I guess it is here: lib/topic_view.rb main .where(topic_id: @topic.id, user_id: @user.id) .where(post_number: @posts.pluck(:post_number)) .pluck(:post_number) post_numbers.each { |pn| result << pn } end @read_posts_set = result end private def calculate_page posts_count = is_mega_topic? ? @post_number : unfiltered_posts.where("post_number <= ?", @post_number).count ((posts_count - 1) / @limit) + 1 end def get_sort_order(post_number) sql = <<~SQL SELECT posts.sort_order

perhaps have a look at this one? (edit: you already have) [图片] Hide ignored users' topics Theme component information_source Summary This component allows you to hide topics from users you’ve ignored hammer_and_wrench Repository GitHub - Lhcfl/discourse-hide-ignored-user-topics · GitHub question Install Guide How to install a theme or theme component open_book New to Discourse Themes? Beginner’s guide to using Discourse Themes Install this theme component Take inspiration from this post: This component allows you to hide topics from users you’ve ignored. It does ex… but I think this is going to be a difficult endeavour. if you can somehow get the post hider to work, how are you going to filter out quoted posts of ignored users for example? the user will still see the replies to the ignored member. Think of a long topic where a bunch of people have others on ignore. the whole topic will be out of context if that happens. All it would take would be 2 or 3 people ignoring a few others and the overlapping ignore circles would create chaos when they all post. People keep looking at this true block problem from the perspective of one user. assuming such a function is possible, as soon as it’s enabled, all these overlapping circles of ignored users will make a mess.

Yes I have looked over that TC. Myself I am not concerned about posts with quotes. The whole context of a topic is not really an issue. We often have topics without ignored users where people simply discuss with certain participants. Ignore feature has already been exploded and proven to work on many platforms. Like Reddit, FB and so that use a 2way block. Giving end users of a site self serve options to ignore content from the ignored and replies(this is where most often a quote will typically be) only serves to help reduce drama and stress on a mod team. Linca’s TC you linked helps to fill one gap as prior to them making it new topics would included topics of the ignored as well as in searches. In a perfect world no one would need an ignore/block control. As one would simply pass reading anything from an individual. Unfortunately a lot of folks have difficulty doing so. I also remember it took awhile before the team would even consider adding the mute/ignore user function. Sometimes ppl are so polarized by their own disdain toward another they feel we as mods should ban ppl as they feel that person(s) is ruining the site for all. I lost a really good contributor who found the ignore function was not good enough as he was bothered by an ignored user who in his opinion was gas lighting others. Even with me explaining the site will notify moderators and the ignored; the community might be finding them toxic if 5 ppl ignored them I explained or tried to. That the person had not met that threshold. Had the replies to said ignored user were hidden he would have been satisfied and not bothered. This is where imho the team needs to be more open to the idea with a simple toggle in site settings and maybe also additionally if enabled a user choice on ignore level. If one’s community discussions are impacted as just about everyone is ignoring each other. Then one really doesn’t have a community.

Thank you Linca. I will look over this and see if I can figure this out. Only additional piece I may need help with is switching target from post/comment author to the person the reply is to. And if I can figure how to port it to JScript. I think studying your TC may also help. I have tried some AI inquiries but not much luck so far. A JScript imho is best as it has no big restrictions to install vs a plugin and the person using the feature is highly unlikely going to try and circumvent it. Best one I had sorta kind of working simply blanked quoted content but still showed there was a quote. But imho simply hiding direct replies should be sufficient for most.

[图片] Lilly: The whole topic will be out of context if that happens. All it would take would be 2 or 3 people ignoring a few others and the overlapping ignore circles would create chaos when they all post. This could be, good reason to be wary of this kind of feature to avoid that. [图片] Dan DeMontmorency: I lost a really good contributor who found the ignore function was not good enough as he was bothered by an ignored user who in his opinion was gas lighting others. Even with me explaining the site will notify moderators and the ignored; the community might be finding them toxic if 5 ppl ignored them That is too bad about your loss. The notification threshold of if five different members to have ignored someone seems kind of arbitrary depending on scale of site. There may be good reason to take moderation action before that number is reached. [图片] Dan DeMontmorency: Best one I had sorta kind of working simply blanked quoted content but still showed there was a quote. But imho simply hiding direct replies should be sufficient for most. In theory this idea makes sense to allow people to hide/ignore both another member and primary direct responses to them. Literal example of this would be that people have a right to bring their own ear muffs to a community meeting so that they don’t have to listen to everyone, and if a lot of arguing breaks out in response to what someone says probably good idea to keep ear muffs on until/if that calms down. However if there is important information in comments / discussion that people are ignoring then there will be redundancy in discussion and possible confusion from missing that.

[图片] Architect: That is too bad about your loss. The notification threshold of if five different members to have ignored someone seems kind of arbitrary depending on scale of site. There may be good reason to take moderation action before that number is reached. 6000 Members; with at that time 300 members regularly active. 5 is very small value. [图片] Architect: However if there is important information in comments / discussion that people are ignoring then there will be redundancy in discussion and possible confusion from missing that. Other platforms already demonstrates it does not affect the discussions & that is the platforms that use a mutual block. Meaning if you block someone you don’t see each other’s posts or replies to one another. See Reddit I personally think just hiding direct replies is sufficient vs the mutual block as the mutual block you might lose some good info. There is a topic on here about shadow bans if you recall? The curre t Discourse Ignore feature works more like a personal shadowban vs a site wide one. Which while site wide shadowbans are maybe not a good idea. Discourse’s personal ignore shadowban is not bad it just needs to have more finess to give those who need a touch more controls. The whole position important info will be lost is a misperception. The team here for a long time avoided any ignore user options & later even added not only this part feature but added permanent as an option as well. A member prior to the team here adding this part feature. One of my members created his own tampermonkey script with ab ignore user feature and it also dressed up Ops, certain groups and also added nicks to certain users It was not a more complete block but was sufficient at that time with the membership when he shared the script. As prior their was no option at all. Bottomline there are communities that really need this extension. A theme component should be sufficient. If you want a key type community - Mental health help communities & political communities can be quite polarized. An over simplified ignore is simply not enough to keep drama down. Some may even need what people call a “True Complete Block”. However I suspect my proposal will be sufficient for most. A TC is sufficient as no one that will use the feature is going to try and circumvent it.

[图片] Dan DeMontmorency: Other platforms already demonstrates it does not affect the discussions & that is the platforms that use a mutual block. Meaning uf you block someone you don’t see each other’s posts or replies to one another. See Reddit With Reddit if you have a Reddit account does that work for all reddit pages or are there independent sites as with discourse? The discourse feature to ban email/I.P. seems like may be already more powerful feature than what other platforms may have. [图片] Dan DeMontmorency: There is a topic on here about shadow bans if you recall? That was interesting topic believe was closed. [图片] Dan DeMontmorency: The curre t Discourse Ignore feature works more like a personal shadowban vs a site wide one. Hadn’t thought about this as that, but could be seen as that for instance people may think their posts are visible and being read by other members when in fact they are not, but that would also be apparent in that there aren’t responses. [图片] Dan DeMontmorency: The whole position important info will be lost is a misperception. That really depends on whether or not there is anything important in what is being ignored. For a site with thousands of members conversations could of course keep going with some people choosing to ignore some other folks. [图片] Dan DeMontmorency: Bottomline there are communities that really need this extension. A theme component should be sufficient. If you want a key type community - Mental health help communities & political communities can be quite polarized. Polarization is no good, that is a major problem with some political systems which were intentionally built to maintain constant polarization just for the sake of being polarized.

[图片] Architect: With Reddit if you have a Reddit account does that work for all reddit pages or are there independent sites as with discourse? The discourse feature to ban email/I.P. seems like may be already more powerful feature than what other platforms may have. Reddit is a system of Pocket Communities. When you choose to block a person it is site wide. The Community Moderators are not like full mods on discourse instance. There for example you can address flags and custom flags; however the flags are anonymous. Only the Reddit team can see who flagged. At most a com mod can due is report flag abuse. The email ip ban is not something a Reddit Community mod has any control of. Being a platform where anyone can create and manage a sub community. It would be foolish to allow anyone that level of access. Discourse’s Category Mod is more akin to this. Richard recently released a great plugin that extends moderation powers to both full mods & category mods to silence a user from a category vs a site wide silence. Note the category mod does not gain the option of a site wide silence. On his road map he plans to eventually add time limit & full category ban.

[图片] Architect: Polarization is no good, that is a major problem with some political systems which were intentionally built to maintain constant polarization just for the sake of being polarized. Indeed this is just one of the types a more complete is a need. Bottom line forums who don’t want to use an optional add on don’t need too. Those that do; do so with the very minor risk the team is concerned with. Some would also say there should be an option to prevent a member from unfollowing a category as the site may require users follow a specific category that has for example important site info. :wink: And that is maybe another truth. You have seen for yourself sometimes other community members react poorly to an individual simply because of their communication style.

[图片] Dan DeMontmorency: Richard recently released a great plugin that extends moderation powers to both full mods & category mods to silence a user from a category vs a site wide silence. Is that @RGJ Richard? That is probably a good feature.

[图片] Architect: Is that @RGJ Richard? [图片] Category Restrictor plugin Plugin Discourse Category Restrictor information_source Summary Allows staff and category moderators to silence users in specific categories hammer_and_wrench Repository Link https://github.com/communiteq/discourse-category-restrictor open_book Install Guide How to install plugins in Discourse moneybag Sponsored by @Gotchur Features Allows staff and category moderators to silence users in specific categories Configuration There is a manage button in category settings - secu…

需要帮助解决 Core Ignore User 的代码问题

开发

Moin 2024 年9 月 24 日 13:37 12

话题		回复	浏览量
Hide ignored users' topics Theme component	33	2383	2025 年3 月 30 日
The Ignore User feature (now in 2.3.0.beta7) Feature	82	14563	2019 年4 月 25 日
Topics created by ignored users showing on homepage Feature	24	3880	2026 年5 月 26 日
How to do a "mutual ignore"? Development	22	3607	2024 年8 月 25 日
Ignore button available for forum users? Feature	21	3976	2019 年11 月 5 日

需要帮助解决 Core Ignore User 的代码问题

相关话题