# New extensibility sub-category: Badge Queries

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-extensibility-sub-category-badge-queries/32645>\
**Category:** Site feedback\
**Created:** [Août 28, 2015, 2:20 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-extensibility-sub-category-badge-queries/32645 "2015-08-28T14:20:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stephen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/stephen/32/95011_2.png) [@Stephen](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Stephen)\
**Post date:** [Août 29, 2015, 6:17 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-extensibility-sub-category-badge-queries/32645/4 "2015-08-29T06:17:55Z")

</div>

Now that the badge analyser is visible again could we not have a sticky in that category explaining how to use costs to determine whether a query will impact performance?

I’ve found out the hard way what happens when bad queries aren’t resolved prior to other operations. Rebuilding with a test badge enabled did some fairly horrible things.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-extensibility-sub-category-badge-queries/32645)._