# El nuevo enlace de invitación debería funcionar para los usuarios existentes

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-invite-link-should-work-for-existing-users/193221
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** invites
**Created:** [8 Junio, 2021 22:55 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-invite-link-should-work-for-existing-users/193221 "2021-06-08T22:55:06Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nathank](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/nathank/32/290039_2.png) [@nathank](https://meta.discourse.org/u/nathank)
#### Post date: [24 Noviembre, 2022 05:19 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-invite-link-should-work-for-existing-users/193221/17 "2022-11-24T05:19:59Z")

</div>

> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> Eso tiene sentido, veremos si podemos mejorar el sistema de invitación para manejar mejor este caso.

Esto se ha solucionado: las personas ahora se agregan a los grupos sin problemas, independientemente de si ya son usuarios o no.

Lo que queda es la incapacidad de permitir que personas de confianza eludan el proceso de aprobación. Actualmente es todo o nada:

> [@Allow users invited by staff to skip approval](https://meta.discourse.org/t/allow-users-invited-by-staff-to-skip-approval/231300):
>
> When a new user joins via an invite link, I’m finding that I also need to approve the user at the moment. This defeats the whole purpose of an invitation; I may as well just send them the link to the forum. I’ve tried this for a variety of situations (new link, old link, single person, multiple) on more than one instance, and it is the same. I’ve got /admin/site\_settings/category/all\_results?filter=must\_approve\_users TRUE for these instances. It seems to be taking it a bit too literally! I wa…

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-invite-link-should-work-for-existing-users/193221)._