# Novo usuário automaticamente silenciado sem opção de aprovar?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-user-auto-silenced-with-no-option-to-approve/77708>\
**Category:** Product Support\
**Created:** [10 Janeiro , 2018 22:53 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-user-auto-silenced-with-no-option-to-approve/77708 "2018-01-10T22:53:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bts](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/bts/32/184556_2.png) [@bts](https://meta.discourse.org/u/bts)\
**Post date:** [10 Janeiro , 2018 22:53 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-user-auto-silenced-with-no-option-to-approve/77708/1 "2018-01-10T22:53:02Z")

</div>

Just had a user get blocked (“silenced”) by system while trying to make their first post, for reason = typing too fast. The user mentioned he was copying something written in another document so that makes sense. But a bit confusing trying to resolve this as an admin:

1. I went in and manually un-silenced the user and told him to try posting again. But when he did, same thing happened. Maybe it would make sense to turn off the auto-block measures in the case an admin has manually overruled it?

2. In [this post](https://meta.discourse.org/t/users-automatically-blocked-by-system/41579/8) from 2016 @codinghorror mentions that “blocked posts by new users always come into the approval queue” — but we didn’t get an admin notification here, it seems this user went straight to “silenced” with no way to approve or not. Only saw it happened at all b/c the user emailed us. If it _were_ the case that this was flagged w/ option to approve, that would be 👍 too!

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-user-auto-silenced-with-no-option-to-approve/77708)._