# New users that have never been Seen or Activated

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-users-that-have-never-been-seen-or-activated/416360>\
**Category:** Community Building\
**Created:** [November 2, 2026, 5:19pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-users-that-have-never-been-seen-or-activated/416360 "2026-11-02T17:19:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 23

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbauman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mbauman/32/139835_2.png) [@mbauman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/mbauman)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2026, 2:24pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-users-that-have-never-been-seen-or-activated/416360/23 "2026-11-05T14:24:50Z")

</div>

Yes, we’re getting the same domains. It’d be nice to have the option to block the entire email domain when deleting a user (instead of needing to do it manually):

 ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/5/0/2/5026f83e2f4e4a36646d637b2d12880e72d7fdc5.png)

A fourth option like **Delete and block email host (`spam.example.com`)** would be beautiful.

Yes, I know we could invert it and use an allowlist instead, but as a technical community we have lots of folks that have self-hosted emails like `discourse@mbauman.com` so I’m loathe to take that step.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/new-users-that-have-never-been-seen-or-activated/416360)._