# Nice work on DFP plugin update

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/nice-work-on-dfp-plugin-update/43422>\
**Category:** Praise\
**Created:** [April 29, 2016, 2:09am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/nice-work-on-dfp-plugin-update/43422 "2016-04-29T02:09:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![charleswalter](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/charleswalter/32/116433_2.png) [@charleswalter](https://meta.discourse.org/u/charleswalter)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2016, 4:31pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/nice-work-on-dfp-plugin-update/43422/5 "2016-04-29T16:31:09Z")

</div>

Oh, does that mean if we have a page of 100 replies that we are making 100 / Nth replies ad calls even if the user doesn’t see them?

I don’t want to turn a topic of praise into a discussion 😉 but this would be harmful to our ad provider relationships. I can lower N for now, but ad visibility is an important issue.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/nice-work-on-dfp-plugin-update/43422)._