# Melding claimt X gebruikers voor goedkeuring, maar er worden er geen gevonden

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/notification-claims-x-users-for-approval-but-none-are-found/262853
**Category:** Bug
**Created:** [25 april 2023 om 17:51 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/notification-claims-x-users-for-approval-but-none-are-found/262853 "2023-04-25T17:51:27Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 28

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![zogstrip](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/zogstrip/32/512781_2.png) [@zogstrip](https://meta.discourse.org/u/zogstrip)
#### Post date: [26 mei 2026 om 14:14 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/notification-claims-x-users-for-approval-but-none-are-found/262853/28 "2026-05-26T14:14:03Z")

</div>

That should fix it 👍

> <https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/40304>
>
> Previously, the \`PendingUsersReminder\` job counted every user with \`approved: fa…lse, active: true\`, including users whose \`ReviewableUser\` had already been rejected but who could not be destroyed (because they had posts or were admins) — producing PMs claiming users were waiting for approval while \`/review\` was empty, as reported in https://meta.discourse.org/t/262853/9.
> 
> This change filters the query to only count users whose \`ReviewableUser\` is still pending, so the reminder's count matches the \`/review\` queue it links to.
> 
> 🤖 Generated with \[Claude Code\](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/notification-claims-x-users-for-approval-but-none-are-found/262853)._