# Official Private Warning Enhancements

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/official-private-warning-enhancements/27763>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [2015 年4 月 20 日 01:21 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/official-private-warning-enhancements/27763 "2015-04-20T01:21:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

作者： ![anon25879736](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e95f7d/32.png) [@anon25879736](https://meta.discourse.org/u/anon25879736)\
发布日期： [2015 年4 月 20 日 23:45 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/official-private-warning-enhancements/27763/9 "2015-04-20T23:45:13Z")

</div>

> [@riking](#):
>
> Yes, as moderators are subject to access control, adding them to the access list is a necessity.
> 
> Setting them to Watching is not necessary.

That seems like a good point. I agree that Watching isn’t necessary, and Regular should be sufficient for all staff who aren’t immediately involved.

To add to that, the main reason I wanted other staff added was that we recently had to issue a warning to a user and he requested that all staff involved in the behind-the-scenes decision be included in the message. When sending the warning initially, I had assumed that other staff would be included automatically, so when I went back in I was surprised that wasn’t the case.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/official-private-warning-enhancements/27763)._