# Optional global invite code

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/optional-global-invite-code/144376>\
**Category:** Announcements\
**Tags:** new-feature, invites\
**Created:** [March 15, 2020, 10:25am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/optional-global-invite-code/144376 "2020-03-15T10:25:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 63

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nathank](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/nathank/32/290039_2.png) [@nathank](https://meta.discourse.org/u/nathank)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2020, 10:02pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/optional-global-invite-code/144376/63 "2020-06-08T22:02:00Z")

</div>

Boy we are excited about this feature - will solve a major headache for us: that of providing an easy ‘bridge’ from Facebook private groups into our forum, and of organisations that are deeply unwilling to share their email lists.

Keep up the great work, and please let us know here when it is live!

> [@MitchB](#):
>
> Would be good to see this available to Trust Level 3 or 4 users.

I’m not sure that is a good idea - this is way too powerful for a non-admin to wield. You could easily create the link and then share it with your trusted users who can then distribute it.

  

> [@techAPJ](#):
>
> Invite Links won’t support landing to specific topic. For that you’ll have to use [Bulk Invite](https://meta.discourse.org/t/sending-bulk-user-invites/16468) feature instead.

That is a real shame, as that would have high value for targeted recruitment links. An example use-case:

> A nervous group of specialist doctors, who feel very vulnerable to their content being aired in the press, and are unwilling to share their email addresses as a group. If they land in a nice friendly place / post by someone they trust, they are much more likely to engage.

Is it very difficult to achieve?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/optional-global-invite-code/144376)._