# CSS для публикации страниц

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/page-publishing-css/394226
**Category:** Support
**Tags:** page-publishing
**Created:** [23.Январь.2026 21:06:47 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/page-publishing-css/394226 "2026-01-23T21:06:47Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Canapin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/canapin/32/119591_2.png) [@Canapin](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Canapin)
#### Post date: [23.Январь.2026 22:44:43 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/page-publishing-css/394226/4 "2026-01-23T22:44:43Z")

</div>

Да, я имел в виду в плане функций, JavaScript и т.д. Даже базовые встроенные функции, такие как динамические даты, не будут работать.

> [@Allow regular posts' js features in published pages](https://meta.discourse.org/t/allow-regular-posts-js-features-in-published-pages/392326?u=canapin):
>
> This has been discussed widely across various categories, and users have asked for certain features specifically to be enabled in published pages[[1]](#footnote-1913141-1)[[2]](#footnote-1913141-2)[[3]](#footnote-1913141-3)[[4]](#footnote-1913141-4), but my wish is that most if all js features users have access to in regular posts should be available for published pages. It would create a way better user experience to have features such as the image viewer, dates, interactive footnotes, table of contents, etc… When reading a published page. I suppose there’s a good technical reason w…

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/page-publishing-css/394226)._