# Personal message responses should not have a minimum length

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/personal-message-responses-should-not-have-a-minimum-length/207900
**Category:** UX
**Tags:** personal-messages
**Created:** [November 1, 2021, 9:49pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/personal-message-responses-should-not-have-a-minimum-length/207900 "2021-11-01T21:49:47Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aliceryhl](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/aliceryhl/32/179746_2.png) [@aliceryhl](https://meta.discourse.org/u/aliceryhl)
#### Post date: [November 1, 2021, 9:49pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/personal-message-responses-should-not-have-a-minimum-length/207900/1 "2021-11-01T21:49:47Z")

</div>

I sometimes get private messages from people who just want to say hi or say thanks. It’s annoying that “Thanks!” is too short for responses to private messages.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ondrej](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/ondrej/32/198804_2.png) [@ondrej](https://meta.discourse.org/u/ondrej)
#### Post date: [November 1, 2021, 9:55pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/personal-message-responses-should-not-have-a-minimum-length/207900/2 "2021-11-01T21:55:00Z")

</div>

This can be changed via the `min personal message post length` site setting I believe

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![awesomerobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/awesomerobot/32/142900_2.png) [@awesomerobot](https://meta.discourse.org/u/awesomerobot)
#### Post date: [November 1, 2021, 9:56pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/personal-message-responses-should-not-have-a-minimum-length/207900/3 "2021-11-01T21:56:00Z")

</div>

The post length requirement for PMs can be configured by the site admin, the setting is called `min personal message post length` and by default it’s a little shorter than the minimum public post length requirement.

Sometimes people find short messages like “Thanks!” annoying (did this need to be a message at all? maybe the like button is enough!), so the default is to require someone to put a little effort into their message before sending it to someone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aliceryhl](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/aliceryhl/32/179746_2.png) [@aliceryhl](https://meta.discourse.org/u/aliceryhl)
#### Post date: [November 1, 2021, 9:59pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/personal-message-responses-should-not-have-a-minimum-length/207900/4 "2021-11-01T21:59:34Z")

</div>

Okay thanks, I’ll ask the people who manage the site in question.

> [@awesomerobot](#):
>
> Sometimes people find short messages like “Thanks!” annoying (did this need to be a message at all? maybe the like button is enough!), so the default is to require someone to put a little effort into their message before sending it to someone.

This is also why I specified responses only. I think the minimum length is very reasonable for the first message in a PM thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![kornelski](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/kornelski/32/211141_2.png) [@kornelski](https://meta.discourse.org/u/kornelski)
#### Post date: [June 12, 2022, 10:33pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/personal-message-responses-should-not-have-a-minimum-length/207900/5 "2022-06-12T22:33:22Z")

</div>

I’ve ran into the same thing. I’m surprised that this setting even exists, and that it has a default \> 0. This is IMHO an unpleasant default behavior, and puts burden on site admins to fix it.

I understand the desire to limit “noise” in a public discussion, but 1:1 conversations are completely different. It’s fine to have a limit on the first message to avoid low-effort “hi”, but not for replies. If someone has sent the first message they’ve already given an implicit permission to receive a reply.

I don’t think the heart button is a sufficient substitute. It doesn’t feel like a proper reply to me. It is a bit ambiguous (is it merely an acknowledgement, or did I _love_ the message?). I _want_ to reply with a manually typed text, even if short, because it feels more appropriate and personal than just pressing a button.
