# 请将“垃圾邮件发送者”添加为暂停用户的理由

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/please-add-spammer-as-reason-for-user-suspension/271804>\
**Category:** UX\
**Tags:** moderation\
**Created:** [2023年七月17日 03:38 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/please-add-spammer-as-reason-for-user-suspension/271804 "2023-07-17T03:38:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon65426961](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/34f0e0/32.png) [@anon65426961](https://meta.discourse.org/u/anon65426961)\
**Post date:** [2023年七月17日 20:16 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/please-add-spammer-as-reason-for-user-suspension/271804/9 "2023-07-17T20:16:01Z")

</div>

哦，有意思，我对报告审核工作流程一无所知。

这似乎是更好的主意，让账户保留在数据库中被暂停，而不是删除它们。有一个选项可以仅删除账户而不阻止电子邮件/IP，但没有仅阻止电子邮件的选项，而是阻止IP和电子邮件（正如你已经知道的，并且在该其他帖子中要求了仅阻止电子邮件的功能），也许这是他们将来可以添加的一个选项。

这里还有另一个帖子讨论了这个问题：

> [@Deleting a user vs suspending?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/deleting-a-user-vs-suspending/75671):
>
> I’m surprised that “delete user” comes up instead of “suspend”. If I delete them, since they aren’t suspended, they can just come back right? [image] Generally when I catch a spammer, I’d assume suspend/ban would make more sense stuck_out_tongue but I’m going to guess I’m missing something I’m not understanding.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/please-add-spammer-as-reason-for-user-suspension/271804)._