# Posts Read Discrepancy

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/posts-read-discrepancy/18694>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [August 10, 2014, 11:36am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/posts-read-discrepancy/18694 "2014-08-10T11:36:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cpradio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/cpradio/32/4970_2.png) [@cpradio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/cpradio)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2014, 4:32pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/posts-read-discrepancy/18694/18 "2014-10-08T16:32:03Z")

</div>

Agreed, but if my posts are included in the right column (number of posts you must read), I’m at a disadvantage if I contributed 200 of those posts in that count (in the last 100 days) and my posts aren’t reflected on the left (for the ones I have read), aren’t I? (than someone who only contributed 30 posts)

Maybe my logic is flawed, but to me it sounds right…

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/posts-read-discrepancy/18694)._