# Propuesta: Cola de revisión consolidada

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/proposal-consolidated-review-queue/105588
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [3 Enero, 2019 15:33 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/proposal-consolidated-review-queue/105588 "2019-01-03T15:33:08Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![AstonJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/astonj/32/215041_2.png) [@AstonJ](https://meta.discourse.org/u/AstonJ)
#### Post date: [7 Enero, 2019 01:11 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/proposal-consolidated-review-queue/105588/6 "2019-01-07T01:11:12Z")

</div>

Sounds great Robin!

As mentioned in [Email on flagged post or those requiring approval](https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-on-flagged-post-or-those-requiring-approval/105328) I think we may need control over who can and can’t ‘reject’ posts, so, for instance, with Trust Level 3 users, we might want to make it so they can _only_ approve posts - and everything else is left in the queue for a trained staff member to review. So any kind of destructive action would only be taken by staff. To make it more user friendly for them - perhaps we could have a ‘deferred’ action (so ‘approve’ or ‘defer’) and then deferring would remove that item from the approval queue for them.

It would also be good to have a record of who approved what - both in a list somewhere (which I think we have in the logs anyway) and displayed with the actual post (eg: “this post was approved by…” even if it is mouseover message on a ‘this post was approved’ icon).

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/proposal-consolidated-review-queue/105588)._