# Propose to send digests equally in time, not all at once

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/propose-to-send-digests-equally-in-time-not-all-at-once/56543>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** activity-summary\
**Created:** [January 29, 2017, 11:28am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/propose-to-send-digests-equally-in-time-not-all-at-once/56543 "2017-01-29T11:28:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2017, 3:46pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/propose-to-send-digests-equally-in-time-not-all-at-once/56543/5 "2017-01-30T15:46:53Z")

</div>

One giant advantage of jitter is that if you happen to mistakenly send spam out there in the digest (something I saw today) there is a higher chance people can get on top of it prior to it being blasted to the rest of the community.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/propose-to-send-digests-equally-in-time-not-all-at-once/56543)._