# Pushing the boundaries of supported installs?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/pushing-the-boundaries-of-supported-installs/314473>\
**Category:** Self-hosting\
**Created:** [July 1, 2024, 3:19pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/pushing-the-boundaries-of-supported-installs/314473 "2024-07-01T15:19:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Isambard](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/858c86/32.png) [@Isambard](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Isambard)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2024, 4:32pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/pushing-the-boundaries-of-supported-installs/314473/3 "2024-07-01T16:32:53Z")

</div>

I wonder if it would make sense to have a ‘beta’ channel so that things like PG16 could be more aggressively introduced and tested esp. among the self-install crowed. This will help identify any issues and help a more rapid adoption of newer versions of PG which come with performance and feature improvements.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/pushing-the-boundaries-of-supported-installs/314473)._