# Pushing the boundaries of supported installs?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/pushing-the-boundaries-of-supported-installs/314473>\
**Category:** Self-hosting\
**Created:** [July 1, 2024, 3:19pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/pushing-the-boundaries-of-supported-installs/314473 "2024-07-01T15:19:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pfaffman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/pfaffman/32/120154_2.png) [@pfaffman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pfaffman)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2024, 6:44pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/pushing-the-boundaries-of-supported-installs/314473/4 "2024-07-01T18:44:08Z")

</div>

It’s pretty unusual that a newer version of PG would cause problems, and it would just be a channel of edge cases, I’m afraid. For the most part, things work the way an expert would expect, and advertising that so-and-so works just fine would just encourage poeple who are not experts to think that they can make it work too.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/pushing-the-boundaries-of-supported-installs/314473)._
