# PUT requests to Suspend account using different content-type on 1.5

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/put-requests-to-suspend-account-using-different-content-type-on-1-5/42789>\
**Category:** Development\
**Created:** [Abril 19, 2016, 3:06am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/put-requests-to-suspend-account-using-different-content-type-on-1-5/42789 "2016-04-19T03:06:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
**Post date:** [Maio 19, 2017, 8:37pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/put-requests-to-suspend-account-using-different-content-type-on-1-5/42789/11 "2017-05-19T20:37:43Z")

</div>

Why can’t we have both.

I think the point @blake is trying to make is that this is not strictly a bug. I agree with that, but one persons bug is another persons feature, and this semantics really does not matter in this case.

Yes, we want to make the API more consistent, I think [my post](https://meta.discourse.org/t/put-requests-to-suspend-account-using-different-content-type-on-1-5/42789/8) offers a good path forward, just waiting on feedback from @eviltrout

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/put-requests-to-suspend-account-using-different-content-type-on-1-5/42789)._