# Recognising logs as code?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/recognising-logs-as-code/319269>\
**Category:** Product Support\
**Tags:** unformatted-code-detector\
**Created:** [June 16, 2019, 11:18pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/recognising-logs-as-code/319269 "2019-06-16T23:18:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tophee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/tophee/32/73406_2.png) [@tophee](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tophee)\
**Post date:** [June 17, 2019, 10:04pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/recognising-logs-as-code/319269/3 "2019-06-17T22:04:21Z")

</div>

> [@lionel-rowe](#):
>
> Quoted blocks aren’t a correct way to format code, and may lead to unexpected results

That’s exactly why I think it shouldn’t be ignored. People keep using quotes to “format” their code…

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/recognising-logs-as-code/319269)._