# Registering/Responding with Blog Integration

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/registering-responding-with-blog-integration/48131>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [2016 年 8 月 2 日午後 8:14 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/registering-responding-with-blog-integration/48131 "2016-08-02T20:14:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jonobacon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jonobacon/32/169578_2.png) [@jonobacon](https://meta.discourse.org/u/jonobacon)\
**Post date:** [2016 年 8 月 2 日午後 8:55 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/registering-responding-with-blog-integration/48131/3 "2016-08-02T20:55:13Z")

</div>

> [@Falco](#):
>
> No. The point on Discourse is bringing the users to your community.

I think this would be doing that, but it would essentially provide different views in which people can participate. My worry about the current implementation is that I think there will be a high bounce rate when people are expected to go to a forum to sign and contribute.

> [@Falco](#):
>
> Depends on the level of integration you want. You want a simple pure text area posted in a dummy account? You want to replicate the entire editor, quote, oneboxing, etc.. ?

If the current implementation had the following two features it would solve my use case:

1. If the user is not logged in, they can log in and sign-up from within the post (showing the usual model for sign-up/log in).
2. When they are logged in there is a composer at the bottom of the comments where they can contribute to the discussion.

Of course, it would also be great to show related discussions so they can go to the forum, but I think the above two features would make the switch to Discourse in blogs much more compelling.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/registering-responding-with-blog-integration/48131)._