# Reply+{messagekey}@... optionaly in header "from" in addition to "reply-to"

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/reply-messagekey-optionaly-in-header-from-in-addition-to-reply-to/27346
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** email
**Created:** [April 8, 2015, 4:05pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/reply-messagekey-optionaly-in-header-from-in-addition-to-reply-to/27346 "2015-04-08T16:05:13Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ashledombos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/ashledombos/32/114818_2.png) [@ashledombos](https://meta.discourse.org/u/ashledombos)
#### Post date: [April 8, 2015, 4:05pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/reply-messagekey-optionaly-in-header-from-in-addition-to-reply-to/27346/1 "2015-04-08T16:05:13Z")

</div>

Hello,

I know it’s not a bug of Discourse, but a missing feature in some email clients (I have three examples in mind, such as the default and, for what I know, only email client of Firefox Os) which ignore the reply-to header, and reply directly to the sender (with the address info@… for exampe in the case of discourse)

Would it be possible to let the user have the possibility to force header “from” being the same as “reply-to”, for workaround?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [April 9, 2015, 3:53am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/reply-messagekey-optionaly-in-header-from-in-addition-to-reply-to/27346/2 "2015-04-09T03:53:02Z")

</div>

Ignoring Reply-To is a very serious bug indeed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ashledombos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/ashledombos/32/114818_2.png) [@ashledombos](https://meta.discourse.org/u/ashledombos)
#### Post date: [April 9, 2015, 7:56am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/reply-messagekey-optionaly-in-header-from-in-addition-to-reply-to/27346/3 "2015-04-09T07:56:19Z")

</div>

Right, but I have seen this problem on various mobile dedicated email app… Until now no problem with desktop programs I tested.

I know it’s not a problem Discourse team is responsible with, but it could be a workaround for helping the user still continue using the ml feature, until these bugs are solved by each email application providere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ashledombos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/ashledombos/32/114818_2.png) [@ashledombos](https://meta.discourse.org/u/ashledombos)
#### Post date: [April 9, 2015, 12:24pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/reply-messagekey-optionaly-in-header-from-in-addition-to-reply-to/27346/4 "2015-04-09T12:24:54Z")

</div>

For information I opened an issue ticket here [1152683 - [email] reply-to header ignored because mailbridge tries to use an array value like a singular value](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1152683)

For the iphone apps, it’s less easy as I did not find a place to report issues, so I made comments about the apps but not sure if they will be read by developers.

Someone replied and even changed the title of my report

> Summary: reply-to header is ignored in email app → [email] reply-to header ignored because mailbridge tries to use an array value like a singular value

Not sure to understand what it means…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![chapoi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/chapoi/32/537252_2.png) [@chapoi](https://meta.discourse.org/u/chapoi)
#### Post date: [December 4, 2025, 11:35am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/reply-messagekey-optionaly-in-header-from-in-addition-to-reply-to/27346/5 "2025-12-04T11:35:50Z")

</div>


