# Require LLM-generated themes & plugins to be tagged as such

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/require-llm-generated-themes-plugins-to-be-tagged-as-such/412871
**Category:** Site feedback
**Created:** [20 בספטמבר,‏ 2026,‏ 7:27pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/require-llm-generated-themes-plugins-to-be-tagged-as-such/412871 "2026-09-20T19:27:15Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![matthewruzzi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b782af/32.png) [@matthewruzzi](https://meta.discourse.org/u/matthewruzzi)
#### Post date: [21 בספטמבר,‏ 2026,‏ 9:47pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/require-llm-generated-themes-plugins-to-be-tagged-as-such/412871/15 "2026-09-21T21:47:47Z")

</div>

I think that thorough review from both humans and AI is a good idea for any important software, regardless of whether it was originally written by humans or AI. It would be nice if there were better tools for reviewing software and keeping track of who reviewed which versions of which packages. There are currently things that are somewhat like this for Rust/Cargo: [Crev](https://github.com/crev-dev/crev), [cargo-vet](https://github.com/mozilla/cargo-vet), and [Thirdpass](https://github.com/thirdpass-org/thirdpass). I have also [started a discussion on the Swift forums](https://forums.swift.org/t/crowdsourced-code-review-system/85795).

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/require-llm-generated-themes-plugins-to-be-tagged-as-such/412871)._